Feedback form
Hi! What do you think?

Drag it here or paste with Ctrl+V


    You can also email us on infocalculat.io

    Cot 134 Degrees

    Sin, Cos, Tan, Cot of an Angle
    Function
    Angle (°)

    What is cot 134°?

    Answer

    cot 134° ≈
    −0.9657

    Angle in radians: 134° = 67π/90. The point of the angle is in quadrant II, where cotangent is negative.

    ≈ — rounded to 4 decimal places. cot 134° can't be written with square roots: 134° is not a multiple of 3°.

    cot 134° = cot(180° − 46°) = −cot 46° ≈ −0.9657

    cot 134° = cos 134° / sin 134° ≈ −0.9657

    xyOP

    P(cos 134°, sin 134°) ≈ (−0.6947, 0.7193)

    C(cot 134°, 1) ≈ (−0.9657, 1) — where line OP meets the line y = 1.

    All four functions of 134°
    FunctionExact valueDecimal
    sin 134°—≈ 0.7193
    cos 134°—≈ −0.6947
    tan 134°—≈ −1.0355
    cot 134°—≈ −0.9657

    Reference angle: cot 46° ≈ 0.9657

    See Also

    Share This Calculation
    Print
    https://calculat.io/en/number/trigonometry/cot--134Copy
    <a href="https://calculat.io/en/number/trigonometry/cot--134">Cot 134 Degrees: Cotangent of 134° on the Unit Circle</a>Copy
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Telegram
    WhatsApp
    Viber
    Email
    Cot 134 Degrees: Cotangent of 134° on the Unit Circle. cot 134° ≈ −0.9657. The cotangent is the ratio x/y of the point at 134° on the unit circle; 134° reduces to 46°.
    https://calculat.io/en/number/trigonometry/cot--134/generated.jpgCopy

    FAQ

    What is cot 134°?

    cot 134° ≈ −0.9657

    Why does cot 134° have no exact value?

    A trigonometric value of a whole number of degrees can be written with square roots only when the angle is a multiple of 3°. 134° is not, so no such exact form exists; the value is used as a decimal: cot 134° ≈ −0.9657.

    Why does a calculator show −0.5236 for cot 134?

    The calculator is in radian mode (RAD): it takes cot 134 as the cotangent of 134 radians, cot 134 rad ≈ −0.5236. Switch it to degrees (DEG): cot 134° ≈ −0.9657. In radians the value is never undefined: π is irrational, so a whole number of radians never lands exactly on an axis.