Feedback form
Hi! What do you think?

Drag it here or paste with Ctrl+V


    You can also email us on infocalculat.io

    Cot 106 Degrees

    Sin, Cos, Tan, Cot of an Angle
    Function
    Angle (°)

    What is cot 106°?

    Answer

    cot 106° ≈
    −0.2867

    Angle in radians: 106° = 53π/90. The point of the angle is in quadrant II, where cotangent is negative.

    ≈ — rounded to 4 decimal places. cot 106° can't be written with square roots: 106° is not a multiple of 3°.

    cot 106° = cot(180° − 74°) = −cot 74° ≈ −0.2867

    cot 106° = cos 106° / sin 106° ≈ −0.2867

    xyOP

    P(cos 106°, sin 106°) ≈ (−0.2756, 0.9613)

    C(cot 106°, 1) ≈ (−0.2867, 1) — where line OP meets the line y = 1.

    All four functions of 106°
    FunctionExact valueDecimal
    sin 106°—≈ 0.9613
    cos 106°—≈ −0.2756
    tan 106°—≈ −3.4874
    cot 106°—≈ −0.2867

    Reference angle: cot 74° ≈ 0.2867

    See Also

    Share This Calculation
    Print
    https://calculat.io/en/number/trigonometry/cot--106Copy
    <a href="https://calculat.io/en/number/trigonometry/cot--106">Cot 106 Degrees: Cotangent of 106° on the Unit Circle</a>Copy
    Facebook
    Twitter
    Telegram
    WhatsApp
    Viber
    Email
    Cot 106 Degrees: Cotangent of 106° on the Unit Circle. cot 106° ≈ −0.2867. The cotangent is the ratio x/y of the point at 106° on the unit circle; 106° reduces to 74°.
    https://calculat.io/en/number/trigonometry/cot--106/generated.jpgCopy

    FAQ

    What is cot 106°?

    cot 106° ≈ −0.2867

    Why does cot 106° have no exact value?

    A trigonometric value of a whole number of degrees can be written with square roots only when the angle is a multiple of 3°. 106° is not, so no such exact form exists; the value is used as a decimal: cot 106° ≈ −0.2867.

    Why does a calculator show −0.9441 for cot 106?

    The calculator is in radian mode (RAD): it takes cot 106 as the cotangent of 106 radians, cot 106 rad ≈ −0.9441. Switch it to degrees (DEG): cot 106° ≈ −0.2867. In radians the value is never undefined: π is irrational, so a whole number of radians never lands exactly on an axis.